mri data processing package dpabi Search Results


mri resting-state data-processing software dpabisurf (dpabi_v6.1)  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc mri resting-state data-processing software dpabisurf (dpabi_v6.1)
Mri Resting State Data Processing Software Dpabisurf (Dpabi V6.1), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mri resting-state data-processing software dpabisurf (dpabi_v6.1)/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mri resting-state data-processing software dpabisurf (dpabi_v6.1) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
depasf 4.3 advanced edition software  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc depasf 4.3 advanced edition software
Depasf 4.3 Advanced Edition Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/depasf 4.3 advanced edition software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
depasf 4.3 advanced edition software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
dpabi software  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc dpabi software
Dpabi Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dpabi software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dpabi software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
dpabi v4 0 190305 software  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc dpabi v4 0 190305 software
Dpabi V4 0 190305 Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dpabi v4 0 190305 software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dpabi v4 0 190305 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
resting-state fmri data processing assistant dpabi_7.0  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc resting-state fmri data processing assistant dpabi_7.0
Aberrant functional connectivity (FC) across the olfactory regions in PD patients and mice. (A) Representative <t>fMRI</t> of the FC from olfactory bulb (OB) between PD patients and healthy control groups. (B) Heatmap of correlation of FC from OB with PC and EC. (C) Quantification of correlation of FC across olfactory circuits between PD patients ( n = 12) and healthy control groups ( n = 11). (D) Diagram of the olfactory-related working memory test. Before the test, mice are habituated to the experimental condition. In the training session, one cheese is hidden behind pole A, and the other with a metal mesh cover is placed on the top of pole B. In the test session, the cheese is removed from pole A and pole B. (E) Quantification of latency to zone A and B and total time in zone A and B during the training session between control and PD mice ( n = 5 in each group). (F) Quantification of latency to zone A and total time in zone A and B during the test session between control and PD mice ( n = 5 in each group). (G and H) OB-aPC coherence of LFPs in control and PD mice during the training session ( n = 5 in each group). (I and J) Pearson’s correlation analysis of latency to zone A and total time in zone A during the test session versus the OB-aPC coherence at the beta band in the training session ( n = 5 in each group). (K and L) OB-EC coherence of LFPs in control and PD mice during the test session ( n = 5 in each group). (M and N) Pearson’s correlation analysis of latency to zone A and total time in zone A during the test session versus the OB-EC coherence at the gamma band in the test session ( n = 5 in each group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns, not significant. Two-way ANOVA for (C), (E), (H), and (I). Unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test for (F).
Resting State Fmri Data Processing Assistant Dpabi 7.0, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/resting-state fmri data processing assistant dpabi_7.0/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
resting-state fmri data processing assistant dpabi_7.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmri data processing package dpabi_v 4.3, 5.0, advanced edition  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc fmri data processing package dpabi_v 4.3, 5.0, advanced edition
Aberrant functional connectivity (FC) across the olfactory regions in PD patients and mice. (A) Representative <t>fMRI</t> of the FC from olfactory bulb (OB) between PD patients and healthy control groups. (B) Heatmap of correlation of FC from OB with PC and EC. (C) Quantification of correlation of FC across olfactory circuits between PD patients ( n = 12) and healthy control groups ( n = 11). (D) Diagram of the olfactory-related working memory test. Before the test, mice are habituated to the experimental condition. In the training session, one cheese is hidden behind pole A, and the other with a metal mesh cover is placed on the top of pole B. In the test session, the cheese is removed from pole A and pole B. (E) Quantification of latency to zone A and B and total time in zone A and B during the training session between control and PD mice ( n = 5 in each group). (F) Quantification of latency to zone A and total time in zone A and B during the test session between control and PD mice ( n = 5 in each group). (G and H) OB-aPC coherence of LFPs in control and PD mice during the training session ( n = 5 in each group). (I and J) Pearson’s correlation analysis of latency to zone A and total time in zone A during the test session versus the OB-aPC coherence at the beta band in the training session ( n = 5 in each group). (K and L) OB-EC coherence of LFPs in control and PD mice during the test session ( n = 5 in each group). (M and N) Pearson’s correlation analysis of latency to zone A and total time in zone A during the test session versus the OB-EC coherence at the gamma band in the test session ( n = 5 in each group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns, not significant. Two-way ANOVA for (C), (E), (H), and (I). Unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test for (F).
Fmri Data Processing Package Dpabi V 4.3, 5.0, Advanced Edition, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri data processing package dpabi_v 4.3, 5.0, advanced edition/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri data processing package dpabi_v 4.3, 5.0, advanced edition - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anti c7orf49 aa 63 112 polyclonal antibody  (Creative BioMart)
N/A
May act as a regulator of proteasome Shipped at 4°C Store at 4°C short term 1 2 weeks Upon delivery aliquot Store at 20°C long term Avoid freeze thaw cycle http www creative diagnostics com
   Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Aberrant functional connectivity (FC) across the olfactory regions in PD patients and mice. (A) Representative fMRI of the FC from olfactory bulb (OB) between PD patients and healthy control groups. (B) Heatmap of correlation of FC from OB with PC and EC. (C) Quantification of correlation of FC across olfactory circuits between PD patients ( n = 12) and healthy control groups ( n = 11). (D) Diagram of the olfactory-related working memory test. Before the test, mice are habituated to the experimental condition. In the training session, one cheese is hidden behind pole A, and the other with a metal mesh cover is placed on the top of pole B. In the test session, the cheese is removed from pole A and pole B. (E) Quantification of latency to zone A and B and total time in zone A and B during the training session between control and PD mice ( n = 5 in each group). (F) Quantification of latency to zone A and total time in zone A and B during the test session between control and PD mice ( n = 5 in each group). (G and H) OB-aPC coherence of LFPs in control and PD mice during the training session ( n = 5 in each group). (I and J) Pearson’s correlation analysis of latency to zone A and total time in zone A during the test session versus the OB-aPC coherence at the beta band in the training session ( n = 5 in each group). (K and L) OB-EC coherence of LFPs in control and PD mice during the test session ( n = 5 in each group). (M and N) Pearson’s correlation analysis of latency to zone A and total time in zone A during the test session versus the OB-EC coherence at the gamma band in the test session ( n = 5 in each group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns, not significant. Two-way ANOVA for (C), (E), (H), and (I). Unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test for (F).

Journal: Research

Article Title: Distinct Olfactory Bulb-Cortex Neural Circuits Coordinate Cognitive Function in Parkinson’s Disease

doi: 10.34133/research.0484

Figure Lengend Snippet: Aberrant functional connectivity (FC) across the olfactory regions in PD patients and mice. (A) Representative fMRI of the FC from olfactory bulb (OB) between PD patients and healthy control groups. (B) Heatmap of correlation of FC from OB with PC and EC. (C) Quantification of correlation of FC across olfactory circuits between PD patients ( n = 12) and healthy control groups ( n = 11). (D) Diagram of the olfactory-related working memory test. Before the test, mice are habituated to the experimental condition. In the training session, one cheese is hidden behind pole A, and the other with a metal mesh cover is placed on the top of pole B. In the test session, the cheese is removed from pole A and pole B. (E) Quantification of latency to zone A and B and total time in zone A and B during the training session between control and PD mice ( n = 5 in each group). (F) Quantification of latency to zone A and total time in zone A and B during the test session between control and PD mice ( n = 5 in each group). (G and H) OB-aPC coherence of LFPs in control and PD mice during the training session ( n = 5 in each group). (I and J) Pearson’s correlation analysis of latency to zone A and total time in zone A during the test session versus the OB-aPC coherence at the beta band in the training session ( n = 5 in each group). (K and L) OB-EC coherence of LFPs in control and PD mice during the test session ( n = 5 in each group). (M and N) Pearson’s correlation analysis of latency to zone A and total time in zone A during the test session versus the OB-EC coherence at the gamma band in the test session ( n = 5 in each group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns, not significant. Two-way ANOVA for (C), (E), (H), and (I). Unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test for (F).

Article Snippet: Then, the functional data were preprocessed with resting-state fMRI data processing assistant (DPABI_7.0, http://rfmri.org/DPABI ) based on the MATLAB 2013b ( https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab ) platform.

Techniques: Functional Assay, Control